While the midwest is routinely described as a safehaven with its cheaper property, small-town mentality, or its lack of cosmopolitanism, Oklahoma is setting itself apart from the stereotypes used to market relocations to the state. It is becoming a fully fledged, anti-Constitutional, police state surveillance center for monitoring citizens automatically.
In Tulsa, Oklahoma where the Tulsa City Police Department dominates the morning, afternoon and evening news with pro-police propaganda, the implementation of police state surveillance measures is intensifying. It is actively implementing a Pasco-style intelligence based policing system into the neighborhoods, roadways, and highways.
A Pasco-style intelligence based policing system is any system that aims is to monitor citizens 24 hours a day with cameras, whose data is centralized into a 1) database, 2) checked against existing identifying information such as a driver’s license, a social security number, or an X-reference (the number the agents of the police state agencies assign for political dossiers), 3) for information related to ‘criminal’ activity 4) for the sake of control. Control can be passive. Passive control is the ability to know when, where, how, what, or why a person does x, y, or z. Control can be active. With knowledge of a person’s activities, the control can be asserted to intercept any or all communications, relations, or finances to prevent a person from being able to enjoy any or all rights afforded under the Constitution. These systems, such as the Pasco system from Pasco, Florida, are not designed to prevent, stop, or eliminate any criminal activity whatsoever, since the police are responsible for the vast majority criminal activity (such as drug trafficking, prostitution, or embezzlement). These systems are ostensibly designed for control.
The Oklahoma District Attorney recently created a council called the Oklahoma District Attorney’s Council. The objective of the council is to automate police state measures in an act to balance the amount of paperwork police at the Tulsa City Police Department have to complete to prosecute citizens for alleged violations of the law.
In its creation of the council, the Oklahoma District Attorney recently launched a program called the “Oklahoma Uninsured Vehicle Enforcement Diversion Program” or UVED. The UVED is a program designed to alleviate Oklahoma State Patrol offices from the paperwork required to enforce the Oklahoma Compulsory Vehicle Insurance Law. The UVED has partnered with technology companies to implement police state measures for monitoring any or all traffic on specific highways, onramps or offramps. In its implementation of these measures, the UVED has centralized the analysis of footage captured by cameras established for this monitoring. In Tulsa, Oklahoma, the UVED, for instance, established one or more of these cameras at the Southwest Boulevard Onramp to Highway 244 in the direction of Tulsa, Oklahoma.
The centralized analysis of footage engages in non-stop identification of vehicles passing to or from these particular points. After identification is complete, the centralized analysis performs the equivalent of what an officer would do, if her or she were to stop a vehicle. The first thing an officer does upon a stop is check whether or not a vehicle’s license, registration or insurance is updated. The centralized analysis performs a check of these things automatically without a stop, eliminating the need for Oklahoma Highway Patrol to stop vehicles.
It stands to mention that there is no basis in the Constitution of the United States of America for a license, registration or insurance; these are state laws designed to increase the revenue a state extracts from its residents. Along the lines of revenue, the UVED program is designed to extract money from Oklahoma drivers.
The system is fully integrated into the wider range of anti-Constitutional surveillance tools the Oklahoma District Attorney leverages against citizens. If, for instance, the Oklahoma District Attorney would like to play games with its Oklahoma residents, the Oklahoma District Attorney can easily track a vehicle through an unwarranted wiretap on the driver’s cellphone, illegally affix to the vehicle a GPS tracking system, or centralize the traffic light cameras to produce a report on the vehicle’s most common routes for the past two years (which the DA may also obtain illegally through Google Maps). With these pieces of information, the Oklahoma District Attorney can fix an entry point for violating the vehicle. With an entry point for violating the vehicle fixed, the Oklahoma District Attorney can either request that the insurance carrier’s information be stricken from the Oklahoma Insurance Verification System or ask the insurance carrier, all of which timidly cower before the ‘law,’ to cancel a driver’s insurance. With both the fixed entry point set up against the stricken or canceled insurance policy, the Oklahoma District Attorney can actively violate targeted drivers. After a targeted driver is violated, the Oklahoma District Attorney passes the information to the Oklahoma Highway Patrol. The Oklahoma Highway Patrol utilizes the information obtained from the hacked telephone, GPS tracking device, or report on the vehicle’s most common routes for the past two years to find the driver. When the driver is found, the Oklahoma Highway Patrol fabricates or utilizes a deeper anti-Constitutional method for the creation of probable cause. With probable cause, the Oklahoma Highway Patrol subjects the driver to a stop, concealing the entire operation with the Oklahoma District Attorney from the driver’s eyes. What happens after the driver is stopped is a matter of the importance of the targeted river. Is the Oklahoma District Attorney violating drivers in this way? In such a way, the Oklahoma District Attorney can assert active control over citizens in the State right from a desktop.
Skeptics may claim that the Oklahoma District Attorney does not engage in operations. A counter argument is readily available. Bryan Kohberger, who allegedly murdered four students in cold blood, became the subject of two stops by Indiana police officers on his way home from Washington State to his father’s house in Pennsylvania. The Indiana officers fabricated probable cause in both instances, stating that Bryan Kohberger had been following too closely the drivers ahead of him. Newsweek, for instance, stated: “At the time of the [stops], ISP said Kohberger still had not been identified as a suspect and there was no available license plate state or number for the Hyundai Elantra, which had been reported as part of the investigation in the media.” [1] While Bryan Kohberger’s cellphone data shows he wasn’t near the murder scene (which the District Attorney’s released only after a Motion to Compel)*, the fact that Indiana police officers stopped him twice before he became a suspect indicates that the Idaho District Attorney together with the Federal Bureau of Investigation coordinates the fabrication or the utilization of a deeper anti-Constitutional method for the creation of probable cause for illegal stops in schemes where District Attorneys are relaying orders to local law enforcement officers. These facts provide that for any locality in the United States, be it the Oklahoma District Attorney, or the Tulsa County District Attorney’s Office, either one of these police state agencies can request local law enforcement to fabricate or utilize a deeper anti-Constitutional method for the creation of probable cause for illegal stops.
The creation of Pasco-style intelligence based policing system is a residual aftereffect from the localization of police state powers the Patriot Act authorized in violation of the Constitution of the United States of America. In the immediate aftermath of the fallen Twin Towers on September 11th, 2001, the United States of America passed the Patriot Act, which granted the Federal government a wide range of powers for treating its citizens like enemies. The Federal government has since delegated much of the functionality of these powers to local law enforcement agencies to distance itself from the consequences of its illegal implementation throughout the country. A secondary reason is to enforce the hierarchy. The local government agencies are required to answer to the Federal government’s police state agencies; the Federal government’s police state agencies such as the FBI, whose role in the United States is to manipulate public opinion to preserve the status quo ante, rely upon the enforced hierarchy to ensure a cohesive system of rule from Federal to State government. It must be emphasized that these ‘law enforcement’ agencies are ready to bend, manipulate, or undermine the law altogether in pursuit of its anti-Constitutional operations.
Against the backdrop of the Federal debt, the United States, which is waging an exceptionally expensive war for no raw materials in the Mediterranean coastal country of Lebanon with its attack dog, Israel, is in an ever deepening state of crisis. The BRICS alliance has strengthened its position with respect to the dollar recently with a summit at which many leading economies agreed to its replacement with a new currency in a new payment system. While the summit did not mint a new coin just yet, the BRICS leaders seek to implement a solution soon. A consequence of America’s crisis is that the dollar may lose significant value, either upon America’s bankruptcy from its intractable Federal debt or by its replacement, causing widespread panic from the adjustment Americans would be forced to embrace. Insurance companies have raised alarm bells about the prospects of unrest. In an article entitled, “Managing the increasing threat of political violence and civil unrest,” Allianz noted how “SRCC [strikes, riots, and civil commotion]” are a source of risk. The decision to reference the word ‘management’ is a subtle nod to the management of Pasco-style intelligence based policing system against citizens.
* The fact that Kohberger required a Motion to Compel for the release of his own cellphone data indicates that the District Attorney oversee his case has sought to prolong his pre-trail detention by way of legal gamesmanship. The Public Defender, who collaborates closely with District Attorneys, has played right along, filing a Motion to Compel rather than one with sanctions or terminating sanctions. In no case can a criminal defendant rely upon America’s heavily corrupted court for a procedure, the law, or justice.
[1] – [“Idaho murders suspect Bryan Kohberger was stopped twice by Indiana cops while driving to parents’ house with dad last month,” Newsweek]