Of all people, the ‘heroes’ you would think would be the last to kidnap children or become recipient abductors but in Sacramento, that’s not the case. Sacramento County Sheriff (i.e., ‘heroes’) are recipient abductors in the County of Sacramento. In most of the cases where children are kidnapped under Welfare and Institutions Code § 300, et sequential, that has been challenged for its lack of any basis in the Constitution, the children are transferred first of all to ‘recipient abductors.’ In most cases, these are Sacramento Sheriffs Officers.

The reason that this is not only a bad policy decision on the part of the powers that be is that the Sacramento Sheriffs Officers are often the ones who accompany agents of the DCFAS to abduct children in the first place. They are accomplices. In cases of kidnapping with alleged criminal activity, the Sacramento Sheriffs is often tasked with ‘investigating’ the parents. If that is not a conflict of interest, then there is something wrong with the definition. Real or perceived, the Sacramento Sheriffs have at their disposal a wide of powers to interfere with the outcome of the cases for children in the care of these recipient abductors.

In at least one case, the Sacramento Sheriffs office sold methamphetamine to a mother whose children were in the care of Sacramento Sheriffs as recipient abductors. In that case, the mother failed her drug tests. The Sacramento Sheriffs as recipient abductors were allowed to keep the child and/or children.

The picture posted above, which is heavily censored to protect the child’s privacy, is a recipient abductee whose parents, sheriffs, participated in the mother’s initial arrest. The reference to 492 days is the length of time the State, which generally takes no less than two years anyway, proceeded through the juvenile dependency case.

This type of corruption happens on a daily basis. It can only be expected to increase as the tendency within the government to find exceptions to Constitutional law increases and the refusal to acknowledge anti-Constitutional activity stiffens.

In addition, there is a significant amount of money involved. The Sacramento Sheriffs as recipient abductors receive substantial sums of money from the county for the children. These monies are like icing on the cake. Not only are the Sacramento Sheriffs as recipient abductors allowed to stand above the law, participate in kidnapping or rig parents’ cases, they allowed to make a tremendous amount of money in the form kickbacks. This is sick.

Residents in the county of Sacramento, California must subject the Sacramento Sheriffs to most detailed counter surveillance imaginable. Parents, who have witnessed the atrocities that the Sacramento Sheriffs commit on a daily basis, must capture these atrocities. Residents must subject Sacramento Sheriffs to randomized First Amendment audits where the aim is to follow Sheriffs patrol vehicles around the county, film any or all incidents, or attempt to investigate (since the Sacramento Sheriffs refusal to comply with an investigation is an exposure). Residents must take steps to cast the Sacramento Sheriffs as they are, corrupt, anti-Constitutional activists, who more a part of the problem than the solution.