- The United States delivered the 13th package of Russophobia sanctions were delivered on the day Ukraine’s war celebrated its bloody second anniversary but none of these sanctions have had a noticeable effect on the Russian economy, which diversified rapidly through strengthened railways, from one end of the pivot’s heartland to the other. The sanctions have exacerbated the descent of the dollar, inspiring world leaders to adopt the primary mode of transaction in a local currency in opposition to the dollar.
- France’s decision to release the list of weapons it donated to Ukrainian armed forces now reveals the depth of sadness Western leaders associated with the idea of ‘vastly superior firepower’ the West never managed to demonstrate with any affect on the battlefield. The analogy that Russia could not handle the foreign assets its adversaries converted to transform a Mexico City into a national security threat is belied by the massive amount of funding, if not arms, these proselytes cobbled together without effect. France is one among many. None of France’s weapons, all of which are among the most expense, most highly engineered, most professional military, equipment in the Western world, played no decisive role in the qualified economy of forces among the waring parties.
- India, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, as I have detailed, began to drift away from American hegemony in terms of currency, military contracts, or oil contracts, following the outcome at the battle of Bakhmut-Artemovsk, which sounded the death knell for American hegemony.
- Germany’s economy together with the rest of Europe plummeted following its exclusion from access to cheap Russian oil, gas, or coal, causing profound shifts of consciousness among the working masses of Europe’s historic legacy at the center of its industrial power. It is undoubtedly an act in furtherance of a Brzezinski-ist approach to reorganizing one of Europe’s so-called ‘pivots,’ an extreme corruption of MacKinder’s characterization of Russia.
- Ukraine’s ‘Spring’ counteroffensive, whose deadly consequences culminated in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians, a deathtrap for the West’s Leopard or Challenger tanks, led to the seizure of Robotyne, a village located within eyeshot of the great General Surovikin’s Surovikin lines of defense. It did not penetrate Russia’s first lines of defense. The Ukrainian armed forces were unable, as the author predicted well ahead of the day the counteroffensive began, to overcome these defenses. The failed Ukrainian ‘Spring’ counteroffensive resulted in the destruction of Ukraine’s fourth reconstituted military, a subject requiring an extensive reading of New York Times to fully substantiate per division or brigade. Ukraine’s challenge with manpower became exacerbated, as Zelensky later attributed the counteroffensive’s failure to Valerii Zaluzhnyi, Former Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, a Bandera-ist, for his refusal to develop a ‘comprehensive program for conscription.’ Although many have attributed Materielschlacht to the disintegration of Ukraine’s lethal military might, nothing could be farther from the truth. Ukraine’s defense industrial complex exists exclusively on the margins of its European handlers’ own defense budgets without any internal industrial military capacity, especial for the maintenance of its Western weapon systems. Ukraine’s failed ‘Spring’ counteroffensive entailed its inability to reconstitute a fifth army with which to hold back Russian forces from further advances along the more than 1,000 mile long Eastern Front.
- Russia entered the second anniversary with an assertion of control over Avdiivka in south western Donetsk. Russia’s control over the embattled village of Avdiivka, a stronghold of historic fortifications with at least a decade of bloody conflict smeared across its street, indicated that the war suddenly became an attempt to consolidate control over the Donbas, the resource rich lynchpin of Ukraine’s post-Soviet industrial heartland. The battle of Bakhmut-Artemovsk settled, to the extent that the Black Sea could be settled by the continued assertion of control over Crimea, the great power relation over the seas extending beyond the Azov Seas, while the diversion in the Ukraine provided the West with an opportunity to renew its pursuit of the Κολχίς the August 2008 war in Georgian stalled. The struggle over the Black Seas continues through the struggle to assert control over Κολχίς, whose dominate country is lining with the allies of the NATO alliance.
- The Ukraine war signified that the beginning of the imperialist epoch began with startling alacrity. Nearly all of the aspects of imperialism Lenin outlines in his famous brochure find further development in the the expression the geopolitical shifts the Ukraine war continues to exacerbate in the center of a struggle for a dominating influence separating US led NATO from the rapidly integrating Russo-Eurasian blocs of power. The Ukraine war, far from reaching the end of the processes culminating in its battles, continues to witness extensions of the great power struggle driving its continuation on the horizons of the Middle East, the Caucasus, as mentioned in relation to Κολχίς, and Africa, which witnessed extraordinary activity in the Sahel region.
- The chorus of mindless Utopians who hail the advent of BRICS as a new way for nation states in an increasingly globalized economy to become ‘balanced,’ as though planets in harmoniously concentric circles sweep out equal areas in equal times, follows from an uncharacteristically shallow investigation of the truth depth of the phenomena resulting from the breakdown in the global order.
- The idea that congenial relationships among competing nation states or great powers may come about on the smashed skulls, broken ribs or dismembered limbs of Ukrainians who fought for the expansion of NATO eastward so that the West might all of a sudden accept the reality of its defeat draws unparalleled discord with Mark Twain’s history of rhymes. The rebuilt Germany twice stuck its fangs into the Russian hinterland with devastating consequences. The United States, a country of exceeding false hubris, is not prepared to walk away with its tail tucked between its legs so that BRICS can pull the rug out from underneath Anthony Blinken’s diplomatic table. Rest assured that those who aren’t at the table are on the menu, as the saying goes. It indicates that the processes giving rise to, if not expanding or contracting within the Ukraine war, are still in effect. The mentality for a global hegemony continues to prevail in the face of Ukraine’s defeat with consequences for its future. Just the United States is returning to its failed operation from 2008 in Tbilisi now with a renewed drive for an assertion of control over Κολχίς, the apples in the eyes of Brzezinski extremists, such as Georgia, Armenia, or or Azerbaijan, the United States is understandably preparing to return to the Ukraine.
- The major American centers of analysis for the Ukraine war, funded by a rich family of donors, at the head of which is a woman often referred to as regime change Karen or big Karen bear, have repeated the various nostrums of ideology that guide the spirit of villainy needed to provide plausible deniability to the illegal, anti-Constitutional, extra-judicial criminal imperialist scheme of arming Eastern European manpower with NATO technologies. The ISW, which is an incredibly insightful source of bias, prejudiced, or partial information, continues to distinguish itself as a source of war propaganda for propagating these nostrums, many of which repeat lies, improbabilities, or myths debunked long ago..
- The continuation of the Ukraine war threatens to explode the various powder kegs the great powers are packing into the countries on its horizon, giving rise to a startling Weltanschauung. The world outlook is now marked by an increasingly terrifying fear of world war, as the dynamics differentiating the results of the great power struggle continue to stratify the differences separating US led NATO from the rapidly integrating Russo-Eurasian blocs of power. The only power capable of ensuring that the antagonisms arising among the world’s great powers cannot find a resolution within the extension of policy to war is the unified mobilization of the international working class.